docs: remove privatekey: & user key -> shared key #133
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gkc
requested changes
Feb 14, 2024
| > The owner of the atServer should be allowed to update or delete the | ||
| > value of a private key. | ||
|
|
||
| 3. User key |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
concept of private key still exists, but does not have an explicit scope of privatekey: - rather, it has no explicit scope - i.e. an example being pk1@alice - and is therefore interpreted as being private.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So section 2 still needs to exist - but needs to be reworded so it does not include the specific visibility scope of privatekey:
|
Added these changes to #166 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #131
- What I did
- How I did it